The phrase “journalism in India” is a vast topic covering various critical aspects of Indian journalism. To fully comprehend this topic, we must understand the historical context, structural composition, technological transformation, the constitutional and legal framework under which it operates, and contemporary challenges.
In This Article
Historical Context
Indian journalism has a complex history of resistance, enlightenment, and social transformation. Journalism in India began during the colonial period as a significant means of intellectual discussion and political opposition to British rule.
The first newspaper, Hickey’s Bengal Gazette (1780), was established by James Augustus Hicky, an Irishman known for critical coverage of the British East India Company’s government officials and policies. It established the fundamental elements of an independent media landscape in India.
Print media played a vital role in the national awakening of the independence movement. Newspapers such as Tilak’s Kesari and Gandhi’s Young India acted as both information sources and catalysts for social and political awareness.
These publications went beyond traditional reporting, serving as platforms for expressing anticolonial sentiments, shaping public opinion, and promoting ideals of freedom, equality, and social justice.
Leaders such as Bal Gangadhar Tilak, Mahatma Gandhi, and Bipin Chandra Pal utilized newspapers for political communication, changing them from simple informational tools to revolutionary platforms.
Important milestones in this journey are establishing the vernacular press, the emergence of nationalist newspapers, and the shift from colonial narratives to independent, indigenous voices in journalism. A detailed account of the language press in India can be read here.
The post-independence era marked a significant shift, with journalism becoming the fourth pillar of democracy. It evolved from political resistance to a medium for social commentary, public discourse, and democratic accountability. A comprehensive exploration of the evolution of print media can be accessed from here.
The historical journey reveals the deep connection between Indian journalism and the country’s political, social, and cultural development, showcasing its ability to adapt and transform through different eras.
Media Landscape and Structural Composition
The media landscape in India showcases a multifaceted and ever-evolving ecosystem marked by remarkable diversity and rapid transformation.
Print media, despite challenges from digital platforms, maintains a significant presence, with over 100,000 registered newspapers published in multiple languages, reflecting the country’s linguistic diversity.
Major Hindi and English language publications like The Times of India, Hindustan Times, and regional language newspapers like Eenadu in Telugu and Ananda Bazaar Patrika in Bengali represent the robust print media segment.
Electronic media, particularly television news channels, have experienced exponential growth since the 1990s, with over 400 news channels broadcasting in various languages, creating a highly competitive 24/7 news environment that has fundamentally reshaped public discourse and information consumption.
The digital journalism landscape has witnessed unprecedented expansion, with online news platforms and regional digital news sites.
Multiple online-only news platforms are catering to diverse audience segments and offering multimedia storytelling capabilities. A few prominent platforms are listed below:
Year of Inception | Name of Platform | Founder | YouTube Subscribers (In Million) As of Dec. 2024 | Nature of Content |
2011 | FirstPost | Raghav Bahl, Ritu Kapur under Network 18. It is currently a Reliance Group Company controlled by Mukesh Ambani. | 6.32 | Digital news website |
2012 | Newslaundry
| Abhinandan Sekhri, Prashant Sareen, Roopak Kapoor, and Madhu Trehan. | 2.15 | Subscription-based media critique news website |
2013 | LiveLaw | MA Rashid, Raghul Sudheesh, and Richa Kachwaha | 522K | Digital news website for Legal News |
2014 | Scroll | Samir Patil, Naresh Fernandes, and Jennifer O’Brien | 458K | Subscription-based news website |
2014 | TheNewsMinute | Dhanya Rajendran, Chitra Subramaniam, and Vignesh Vellore | 563K | Subscription-based news website |
2015 | TheWire | M.K. Venu, Sidharth Bhatia and Siddharth Varadarajan | 5.57 | Subscription-based news website |
2015 | TheQuint | Raghav Bahl and Ritu Kapur | 4.02 | Subscription-based news website |
2016 | Lallantop | Saurabh Dwivedi. Currently, The Lallantop is a subsidiary of the India Today group. | 31.9 | YouTube-based digital news platform |
2017 | ThePrint | Shekhar Gupta | 2.7 | Digital news website |
Indian media is characterized by language diversity, with news platforms available in over 22 official languages and many dialects, providing broad geographical and cultural representation.
Media ownership in India is predominantly concentrated among large corporate conglomerates like the Reliance Group, Times Group, and Zee Media, which control significant stakes across print, electronic, and digital platforms, raising critical questions about editorial independence and media plurality.
The coexistence of public and private media, including state-owned entities like Prasar Bharati and numerous private media houses, creates a diverse media landscape that reflects government views and offers alternative narratives as well.
This intricate media landscape demonstrates India’s commitment to democratic communication while also highlighting the ongoing challenges of maintaining journalistic integrity, diversity, and independence in an increasingly commercialized and politically complex media environment.
Constitutional and Legal Framework
The framework for journalism in India is based on the principles of freedom of expression, primarily outlined in Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees the right to freedom of speech and expression.
This constitutional provision underpins media freedoms, while Article 19(2) allows reasonable restrictions for sovereignty, integrity, security, foreign relations, public order, decency, and contempt of court.
The Press Council of India, established in 1966, is a statutory, quasi-judicial body that maintains and improves journalism standards. It investigates complaints against newspapers and journalists and promotes ethical practices in journalism.
Media regulation in India includes constitutional safeguards, statutory bodies, and legislative frameworks such as the Cable Television Networks (Amendment) Rules, 2021; the Information Technology Act, 2000; and various state-level regulations that oversee media operations.
Several landmark judicial pronouncements have significantly shaped the legal landscape of journalism, such as the Romesh Thappar vs State of Madras (1950) case, which affirmed press freedom as a fundamental right, and the subsequent Kedar Nath Singh vs State of Bihar (1962) case that defined the boundaries of free speech about criticism of public figures.
The Kedarnath vs State of Bihar case reaffirmed the importance of dissent and criticism in a healthy democracy, ensuring that mere criticism of the government cannot be deemed seditious unless it incites violence or public disorder.
Indian journalism faces legal challenges such as defamation, sedition laws, contempt of court provisions, and growing government efforts to control media narratives.
- The court ordered that no coercive action be taken in pending sedition cases.
- The court also urged the Centre and state governments not to register any new FIRs under the provision.
- The court’s decision came after the Union Government stated that it would reconsider the law. The government agreed with the court’s view that the law was not in line with the current social milieu and was intended for when the country was under colonial rule.
The court’s decision was made in response to a petition filed in February 2021 by two journalists, Kishore Wangkhemcha and Kanhaiya Lal Shukla. The petition challenged the constitutionality of the sedition law, which defines sedition as “attempts to excite disaffection towards the government established by law in India.”
The court’s decision was based on concerns that the sedition law has a chilling effect on free speech. The court also noted that the law was added to the IPC in 1898 when India was under British rule.
The evolving legal framework reflects the ongoing tension between protecting press freedom and maintaining national security and social harmony, with the judiciary playing a crucial role in balancing these competing interests.
This dynamic legal environment demonstrates India’s commitment to democratic principles while simultaneously addressing the complex challenges of regulating media in a diverse and complex social landscape.